{"id":47,"date":"2026-03-16T03:27:13","date_gmt":"2026-03-16T03:27:13","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/award.wiserighteous.org\/?page_id=47"},"modified":"2026-03-16T03:35:15","modified_gmt":"2026-03-16T03:35:15","slug":"judging","status":"publish","type":"page","link":"https:\/\/award.wiserighteous.org\/index.php\/judging\/","title":{"rendered":"Judging"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The Righteousness Award Scoring Rubric<\/p>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-table\"><table class=\"has-fixed-layout\"><thead><tr><th>Criteria<\/th><th>Weight<\/th><th>Description<\/th><th>Scoring Guide<\/th><\/tr><\/thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>Moral Courage &amp; Integrity<\/strong><\/td><td>40%<\/td><td>Demonstrates ethical leadership, standing up for righteousness even in difficult circumstances, and consistent integrity in actions.<\/td><td>1-3: Some ethical behavior, minor courage. 4-6: Clear examples of standing up for what is right. 7-10: Exemplary moral courage, unwavering integrity, sets a role model.<\/td><\/tr><tr><td><strong>Impact &amp; Influence<\/strong><\/td><td>30%<\/td><td>The tangible positive effect of the nominee\u2019s actions on individuals, communities, or society, and how many people are inspired toward righteousness.<\/td><td>1-3: Limited influence, minor effect. 4-6: Noticeable impact in a specific community or context. 7-10: Broad, transformative influence that inspires many.<\/td><\/tr><tr><td><strong>Innovation &amp; Creativity<\/strong><\/td><td>20%<\/td><td>Unique approaches or strategies to advance righteousness, justice, or ethical conduct.<\/td><td>1-3: Conventional approach, minor originality. 4-6: Meaningful creativity in approach or advocacy. 7-10: Highly innovative or groundbreaking approach that advances righteousness.<\/td><\/tr><tr><td><strong>Sustainability &amp; Reach<\/strong><\/td><td>10%<\/td><td>Potential for long-term positive effects and influence on others (individuals, groups, or organizations).<\/td><td>1-3: Short-term, limited reach. 4-6: Sustainable within certain communities. 7-10: Long-lasting, broad-reaching effect that can scale to inspire many.<\/td><\/tr><\/tbody><\/table><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\">Judging Panel Composition<\/h2>\n\n\n\n<ol class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li><strong>Panel Assembly:<\/strong> An independent panel of several judges will be convened by the Righteousness Award Secretariat.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>Expertise:<\/strong> Judges will be selected based on their distinguished expertise across fields relevant to righteousness, ethical leadership, social impact, community service, justice, advocacy, education, and organizational excellence.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>Term:<\/strong> Judges serve for a single award cycle to ensure fresh perspectives, uphold fairness, and mitigate conflicts of interest.<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n\n\n\n<hr class=\"wp-block-separator has-alpha-channel-opacity\"\/>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\">Ethics and Conflict of Interest<\/h2>\n\n\n\n<ol class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li><strong>Mandatory Disclosure:<\/strong> All judges must sign a conflict-of-interest disclosure form prior to reviewing any submissions. They must declare any past, present, or anticipated personal, professional, or organizational relationships with nominees.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>Recusal Policy:<\/strong> A judge must immediately recuse themselves from evaluating any nomination where a conflict exists. The Secretariat will reassign such entries to another qualified judge.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>Confidentiality Agreement:<\/strong> All judges are bound by a strict confidentiality agreement. Discussions, deliberations, and nomination details are strictly confidential and not to be disclosed outside the judging process.<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\">Evaluation Process &amp; Timeline<\/h2>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-table\"><table class=\"has-fixed-layout\"><thead><tr><th>Phase<\/th><th>Timeline<\/th><th>Activity<\/th><th>Outcome<\/th><\/tr><\/thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>1. Preliminary Screening<\/strong><\/td><td>September<\/td><td>The Secretariat verifies eligibility, completeness, and validity of nominations. Judges perform an initial remote review, scoring entries against core criteria (Moral Courage, Impact, Innovation, and Sustainability).<\/td><td>A <strong>shortlist of nominees<\/strong> (individuals, groups, or organizations) advances to the next round.<\/td><\/tr><tr><td><strong>2. Deliberation &amp; Deep Review<\/strong><\/td><td>Early October<\/td><td>Judges convene (in-person or virtually) for a detailed internal review of shortlisted nominations. They evaluate all submitted materials, compare entries, and assign scores according to the rubric.<\/td><td>Judges <strong>finalize scores and rankings<\/strong> for each nominee.<\/td><\/tr><tr><td><strong>3. Final Selection<\/strong><\/td><td>Late October<\/td><td>The judging panel convenes to deliberate, finalize the slate of awardees, and may assign <strong>special recognitions<\/strong> (e.g., Honorable Mention, Group\/Organization Awards).<\/td><td>The <strong>official list of awardees<\/strong> is locked and sent for announcement preparation.<\/td><\/tr><\/tbody><\/table><\/figure>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>The Righteousness Award Scoring Rubric Criteria Weight Description Scoring Guide Moral Courage &amp; Integrity 40% Demonstrates ethical leadership, standing up for righteousness even in difficult circumstances, and consistent integrity in actions. 1-3: Some ethical behavior, minor courage. 4-6: Clear examples of standing up for what is right. 7-10: Exemplary moral courage, unwavering integrity, sets a [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"parent":0,"menu_order":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","template":"","meta":{"footnotes":""},"class_list":["post-47","page","type-page","status-publish","hentry"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/award.wiserighteous.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/47","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/award.wiserighteous.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/award.wiserighteous.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/page"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/award.wiserighteous.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/award.wiserighteous.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=47"}],"version-history":[{"count":5,"href":"https:\/\/award.wiserighteous.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/47\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":52,"href":"https:\/\/award.wiserighteous.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/47\/revisions\/52"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/award.wiserighteous.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=47"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}